{"id":437710,"date":"2026-09-08T17:10:22","date_gmt":"2026-09-08T10:10:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/market-news\/a-book-vs-b-book-how-brokers-actually-manage-your-trades-437710\/"},"modified":"2026-09-08T17:10:22","modified_gmt":"2026-09-08T10:10:22","slug":"a-book-vs-b-book-how-brokers-actually-manage-your-trades","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/market-news\/a-book-vs-b-book-how-brokers-actually-manage-your-trades-437710\/","title":{"rendered":"A-Book vs B-Book: How Brokers Actually Manage Your Trades"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p style=\"margin: 17px 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 17px\">Quick answer<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">The usual explanation is simple. An A-book<br \/>\n        broker hedges a client trade with a liquidity provider, while a B-book broker<br \/>\n        keeps the exposure and may benefit if the client loses.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">That explanation is useful as a starting<br \/>\n        point, but it is not how most established CFD brokers manage risk in practice.<br \/>\n        A CFD broker remains the client&#8217;s contractual counterparty. Separately, the<br \/>\n        broker may offset opposing client positions, hedge some or all of its net<br \/>\n        exposure externally, or retain a limited amount of risk within defined<br \/>\n        controls.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">In practice, many established CFD brokers<br \/>\n        use some form of hybrid or portfolio-level risk management. They manage the<br \/>\n        combined exposure created by thousands of trades rather than mechanically<br \/>\n        sending every individual order to a liquidity provider or simply betting<br \/>\n        against every client.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?q=https:\/\/secure.basemarkets.com\/marketing\/links\/go\/18&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1788524114653000&amp;sa=E\" rel=\"follow\">Base Markets<\/a> is a useful example. It<br \/>\n        manages exposure primarily at aggregate portfolio level, considering exposure<br \/>\n        across its client book, internally offsetting opposing positions, and managing<br \/>\n        the residual through external hedging and controlled risk retention. Base&#8217;s<br \/>\n        decision to offset, hedge, or retain the resulting exposure does not, in<br \/>\n        itself, change the pricing and execution terms applicable to the client&#8217;s<br \/>\n        account.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">That distinction matters. The more useful<br \/>\n        questions are not whether a broker uses a fashionable label, but whether its<br \/>\n        pricing is clear, its execution is fair, its risk is controlled, and it can<br \/>\n        meet withdrawals when clients are profitable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 17px 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 17px\">What this guide covers<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">This guide explains:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>what the industry usually means by<br \/>\n        A-book and B-book<\/li>\n<li>what legally and operationally<br \/>\n        happens when a CFD trade is opened<\/li>\n<li>how internalisation, netting, and<br \/>\n        external hedging work together<\/li>\n<li>where genuine conflicts of<br \/>\n        interest can arise<\/li>\n<li>what traders should ask a broker<br \/>\n        before depositing<\/li>\n<li>how <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?q=https:\/\/secure.basemarkets.com\/marketing\/links\/go\/18&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1788524114653000&amp;sa=E\" rel=\"follow\">Base Markets<\/a> applies these<br \/>\n        principles in practice<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"margin: 17px 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 17px\">A-book and B-book: the<br \/>\n        conventional explanation<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">In retail trading, A-book and B-book are<br \/>\n        informal industry terms. They are not precise legal classifications, and<br \/>\n        different brokers sometimes use them differently.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0 5px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 15px\">What is usually meant<br \/>\n        by A-book?<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">An A-book model is commonly described as<br \/>\n        straight-through processing, or STP. The broker receives a client order and<br \/>\n        creates an equivalent hedge with a bank, prime broker, non-bank market maker,<br \/>\n        or another liquidity provider.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">If a client buys 10 lots of EUR\/USD, the<br \/>\n        broker buys 10 lots externally. The client&#8217;s profit or loss is substantially<br \/>\n        offset by the external hedge, leaving the broker to earn from commission,<br \/>\n        spread markup, financing, or other disclosed charges.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">This is often marketed as if the client&#8217;s<br \/>\n        trade itself has been passed into the market. With an over-the-counter CFD,<br \/>\n        that description is incomplete. The client&#8217;s contract remains with the broker.<br \/>\n        The external transaction is the broker&#8217;s own hedge of the exposure created by<br \/>\n        that contract.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0 5px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 15px\">What is usually meant<br \/>\n        by B-book?<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">A B-book model is commonly described as the<br \/>\n        broker retaining the risk. If the client buys 10 lots, the broker does not<br \/>\n        necessarily create an equivalent external hedge. The broker remains<br \/>\n        economically exposed to the client&#8217;s result.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">If the client loses, retained client<br \/>\n        trading losses may benefit the broker. If the client wins, the broker must pay<br \/>\n        the profit from its own resources. This creates a potential conflict, but it<br \/>\n        does not by itself prove that the client received an unfair price or execution.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0 5px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 15px\">The simple comparison<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 17px 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 17px\">What actually happens when you trade a CFD?<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">When a client buys a CFD, the broker is the<br \/>\n        contractual counterparty to that CFD. The client is not normally acquiring the<br \/>\n        underlying currency, index, commodity, or share from the external market. The<br \/>\n        broker calculates the client&#8217;s profit or loss by reference to the relevant<br \/>\n        market price and settles the CFD under its terms.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">The trade creates market exposure for the<br \/>\n        broker. The broker then decides how to manage that exposure. It may:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>offset it against a client<br \/>\n        position in the opposite direction<\/li>\n<li>hedge it with one or more external<br \/>\n        liquidity providers<\/li>\n<li>retain it temporarily or<br \/>\n        permanently within an approved risk limit<\/li>\n<li>use a combination of all three<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">These are risk-management decisions made<br \/>\n        behind the client contract. They should not determine whether the client<br \/>\n        receives fair pricing, appropriate execution, or access to valid profits.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">This is why statements such as &#8220;your<br \/>\n        order is sent directly to the market&#8221; should be read carefully. They may<br \/>\n        describe the broker&#8217;s hedging process, but they do not alter the legal<br \/>\n        structure of an OTC CFD. ECN, STP, agency, A-book, and B-book can be useful<br \/>\n        shorthand, but none of them replaces a clear explanation of who the<br \/>\n        counterparty is and how the broker manages exposure.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 17px 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 17px\">One client, two<br \/>\n        clients, and thousands of clients<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">The mechanics become clearer when viewed at<br \/>\n        portfolio level.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0 5px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 15px\">One client buys 100<br \/>\n        lots<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Assume one client buys 100 lots of EUR\/USD and<br \/>\n        there are no other relevant positions. A broker that does not want the<br \/>\n        directional risk can buy 100 lots from a liquidity provider.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Suppose, purely for illustration, the<br \/>\n        client pays USD 7 per lot round turn and the external hedge costs the broker<br \/>\n        USD 5 per lot. The broker&#8217;s gross difference is USD 2 per lot before<br \/>\n        technology, staffing, regulation, payments, bad debt, financing, and other<br \/>\n        operating costs.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">The important commercial point is that a<br \/>\n        durable broker does not need the client to lose. It can earn a fair amount from<br \/>\n        repeated trading activity. A profitable client who continues trading for years<br \/>\n        can be more valuable than a client who loses a USD 500 balance once and leaves.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">For Base, the better commercial outcome is<br \/>\n        to earn a fair amount from a client who trades for years, rather than make a<br \/>\n        larger one-off gain when that client loses everything and leaves.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Base applies that principle through<br \/>\n        transparent pricing. On FX, Base Zero charges USD 2 per side, or USD 4 round<br \/>\n        turn per standard lot. The commercial objective is recurring, clearly disclosed<br \/>\n        trading revenue and a long-term relationship, not dependence on an individual<br \/>\n        client&#8217;s loss.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0 5px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 15px\">One client buys 100<br \/>\n        lots and another sells 100 lots<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Now assume one client is long 100 lots and<br \/>\n        another is short 100 lots in the same instrument. Their positions create no net<br \/>\n        directional exposure for the broker at that moment.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">If the market rises, the broker owes the<br \/>\n        long client and receives the corresponding loss from the short client. If the<br \/>\n        market falls, the economic result reverses. The broker effectively administers<br \/>\n        the two contracts and charges each client the disclosed trading costs.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Hedging both positions separately would<br \/>\n        create external commission, spread, financing, and margin costs without<br \/>\n        reducing the broker&#8217;s net market risk. Internally offsetting them is therefore<br \/>\n        not automatically a trick or a bet against either trader. It is a rational way<br \/>\n        to manage a portfolio.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">This process is usually called<br \/>\n        internalisation or netting. It can improve the broker&#8217;s economics and reduce<br \/>\n        unnecessary dependence on external liquidity. It can also provide additional<br \/>\n        capacity because the broker does not need to send two offsetting positions into<br \/>\n        the market simply to cancel them out.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0 5px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 15px\">Thousands of clients<br \/>\n        trade continuously<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Real broker books are far more dynamic.<br \/>\n        Thousands of clients open, close, increase, reduce, and reverse positions<br \/>\n        across many instruments and time horizons. Some exposures offset immediately.<br \/>\n        Others remain unmatched for seconds, hours, or longer.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Imagine clients are collectively long<br \/>\n        1,000 lots and short 1,000.01 lots. The broker&#8217;s net exposure is only 0.01<br \/>\n        lots. It may decide that this difference is too small to hedge efficiently, is<br \/>\n        within its risk tolerance, or is likely to be offset by the next incoming<br \/>\n        order.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Now imagine the book is long 1,000 lots<br \/>\n        and short 900 lots. The broker has a net long exposure of 100 lots. It can<br \/>\n        hedge all of that residual, hedge part of it, or retain it within approved<br \/>\n        limits. The decision may depend on volatility, liquidity, concentration, event<br \/>\n        risk, available LP credit, and the broker&#8217;s capital.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">This portfolio approach explains why a<br \/>\n        broker&#8217;s headline hedging percentage can be misleading. In the 1,000-lot long<br \/>\n        and 900-lot short example, hedging 100 lots represents only 5.3% of the 1,900<br \/>\n        lots of gross positions, but it represents 100% of the broker&#8217;s net directional<br \/>\n        exposure. The denominator matters.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">It also explains why asking whether a<br \/>\n        particular trade was A-booked or B-booked may produce a false sense of<br \/>\n        certainty. An individual client position can be internally offset today, part<br \/>\n        of an external portfolio hedge a moment later, and offset again as the book<br \/>\n        changes.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 17px 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 17px\">How CFD brokers make<br \/>\n        money<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">A broker can earn revenue from several<br \/>\n        sources, including:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>commission charged per lot or as a<br \/>\n        percentage of value<\/li>\n<li>a disclosed markup within the<br \/>\n        spread<\/li>\n<li>overnight financing charges<\/li>\n<li>urrency conversion and other<br \/>\n        clearly stated fees<\/li>\n<li>the net result of market exposure<br \/>\n        retained by the broker<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">The first four sources can support a<br \/>\n        straightforward, repeatable business. A broker provides access, technology,<br \/>\n        execution, risk infrastructure, payments, and service in exchange for<br \/>\n        transparent charges.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Retained exposure is different because its<br \/>\n        result varies with client performance and the market. It can produce gains or<br \/>\n        losses for the broker. A properly managed firm treats that as a controlled<br \/>\n        portfolio risk, not as permission to interfere with a client trade.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0 5px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 15px\">Why internalisation is not automatically bad<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Internalisation is sometimes presented as<br \/>\n        evidence that the broker is trading against its clients. That is too<br \/>\n        simplistic.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">The broker is already the contractual<br \/>\n        counterparty to the CFD. Whether it hedges the resulting exposure is a separate<br \/>\n        treasury and risk decision. If opposing client positions naturally offset,<br \/>\n        avoiding two unnecessary external hedges can reduce transaction costs, LP<br \/>\n        margin requirements, and operational friction.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">It can also make more liquidity available<br \/>\n        to clients than the broker could obtain from a single external venue at a<br \/>\n        particular moment. The broker can combine internal flow with multiple liquidity<br \/>\n        providers and use its own risk capacity to support execution.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">The client should care about the outcome:<br \/>\n        Was the price derived fairly? Was the order handled consistently? Was any<br \/>\n        slippage genuine and applied according to disclosed rules? Can the broker meet<br \/>\n        the resulting obligation if the client wins?<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Internalisation becomes a problem when the<br \/>\n        broker&#8217;s economic interest in a client loss begins to influence those answers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 17px 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 17px\">Where the conflict<br \/>\n        becomes unacceptable<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">A retained-risk model creates a potential<br \/>\n        conflict because the broker may benefit economically when clients lose.<br \/>\n        Potential conflicts exist in many financial businesses. The test is how they<br \/>\n        are controlled.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">The line is crossed when a broker uses its<br \/>\n        control over the trading environment to manufacture or increase client losses.<br \/>\n        Warning signs can include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>unjustified or consistently<br \/>\n        asymmetric slippage<\/li>\n<li>prices that depart materially from<br \/>\n        credible market references without explanation<\/li>\n<li>arbitrary spread widening<br \/>\n        unrelated to market conditions<\/li>\n<li>selective delays or rejection of<br \/>\n        profitable orders<\/li>\n<li>cancellation of legitimate<br \/>\n        profitable trades after the event<\/li>\n<li>withdrawal obstruction or pressure<br \/>\n        to keep funds in the account<\/li>\n<li>different execution treatment<br \/>\n        based on whether the client is winning<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">These are not theoretical concerns. Regulators<br \/>\n        have pursued CFD businesses for systemic unconscionable conduct involving<br \/>\n        manipulation of client trades and obstruction of withdrawals. One documented<br \/>\n        example is the <a href=\"https:\/\/asic.gov.au\/about-asic\/news-centre\/find-a-media-release\/2024-releases\/24-287mr-federal-court-finds-cfd-issuers-engaged-in-systemic-unconscionable-conduct-with-customer-losses-totalling-over-83-million\/\" rel=\"follow\">Australian<br \/>\n                Securities and Investments Commission&#8217;s 2024 Federal Court case<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">The lesson is not that every broker<br \/>\n        retaining exposure behaves improperly. It is that execution controls, financial<br \/>\n        strength, governance, and withdrawal conduct matter more than a marketing<br \/>\n        label.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 17px 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 17px\">Why the broker&#8217;s<br \/>\n        capital matters<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">External hedging requires capital. A broker<br \/>\n        may offer a client 500:1 leverage while receiving only 100:1 from its liquidity<br \/>\n        provider.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">For a simplified USD 100,000 position, the<br \/>\n        client may post USD 200 of margin at 500:1. To create the same external hedge<br \/>\n        at 100:1, the broker may need to post USD 1,000 with its LP. That is five times<br \/>\n        the client&#8217;s margin. The USD 1,000 is collateral committed while the hedge<br \/>\n        remains open, rather than a trading cost, and is normally released when the<br \/>\n        hedge is closed. At 100 lots, the simplified requirement becomes USD 20,000<br \/>\n        from clients against USD 100,000 at the LP.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Actual requirements vary by asset,<br \/>\n        counterparty, concentration, volatility, and credit arrangement, but the<br \/>\n        principle is important. A broker can promise high leverage more easily than it<br \/>\n        can fund a large hedging programme.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Retaining exposure also requires financial<br \/>\n        strength. If clients are profitable in aggregate, the broker must pay them.<br \/>\n        Sharp events such as the removal of the Swiss franc floor in 2015 can create<br \/>\n        concentrated gains and losses quickly. A weak broker may respond by delaying<br \/>\n        withdrawals, disputing legitimate trades, asking clients not to withdraw, or<br \/>\n        failing altogether.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?q=https:\/\/secure.basemarkets.com\/marketing\/links\/go\/18&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1788524114653000&amp;sa=E\" rel=\"follow\">Base Markets<\/a> is majority-owned by an<br \/>\n        investment fund. That financial backing matters because external hedging<br \/>\n        requires properly funded LP accounts, while retained exposure requires the<br \/>\n        broker to have sufficient liquidity to meet profitable client positions and<br \/>\n        withdrawals.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Financial backing is not a substitute for<br \/>\n        risk controls, and regulation is the starting point rather than the entire<br \/>\n        story. It does, however, help distinguish a broker built to operate through<br \/>\n        difficult markets from one dependent on the next wave of client deposits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 17px 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 17px\">Can you identify an<br \/>\n        A-book or B-book broker from the platform?<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Not reliably.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Variable spreads, commission-based<br \/>\n        accounts, positive or negative slippage, re-quotes, fast execution, and MT5<br \/>\n        Depth of Market do not prove whether the broker hedged the resulting exposure<br \/>\n        externally. Those features may say something about pricing or execution, but<br \/>\n        they do not reveal the broker&#8217;s complete risk book.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">A &#8220;raw&#8221; account does not prove<br \/>\n        agency execution. A fixed spread does not prove B-booking. A liquidity-provider<br \/>\n        logo does not show which exposures are hedged, when they are hedged, or in what<br \/>\n        amount. Even a broker that hedges extensively may aggregate transactions rather<br \/>\n        than replicate each client order one for one.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">The better approach is simpler: ask the<br \/>\n        broker.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Traders should not need to conduct<br \/>\n        forensic analysis on an MT5 account to understand a broker&#8217;s business model.<br \/>\n        They should be able to ask the broker and receive a straight answer.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Useful questions include:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Are you the contractual<br \/>\n        counterparty to my CFD?<\/li>\n<li>Do you manage exposure at<br \/>\n        individual trade or aggregate portfolio level?<\/li>\n<li>Do opposing client positions<br \/>\n        offset internally?<\/li>\n<li>How do you manage residual<br \/>\n        exposure and concentration risk?<\/li>\n<li>Does execution or pricing change<br \/>\n        according to how my exposure is managed?<\/li>\n<li>What are the total trading costs,<br \/>\n        including commission, spread, financing, and conversion?<\/li>\n<li>How are client funds held, and<br \/>\n        what is the normal withdrawal process?<\/li>\n<li>Who owns and finances the<br \/>\n        brokerage?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">A credible broker may not publish its<br \/>\n        liquidity counterparties, hedge thresholds, or real-time exposure. Those can be<br \/>\n        commercially sensitive risk-management details. It should still be able to<br \/>\n        explain its model clearly, identify its regulator and legal entity, publish its<br \/>\n        charges, and describe how it handles execution and withdrawals.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Separately agreed institutional hedging<br \/>\n        arrangements may be considered where legally, operationally, and commercially<br \/>\n        appropriate, subject to liquidity, margin, volume, and reporting requirements.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 17px 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 17px\">How Base Markets<br \/>\n        applies the model<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.basemarkets.com\/legal-documentation\/\" rel=\"follow\">Base Markets<\/a> is regulated<br \/>\n                by the Financial Services Commission of Mauritius under licence number<br \/>\n                GB25204723.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Base&#8217;s approach can be summarised plainly:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Base is the contractual<br \/>\n        counterparty to client CFDs.<\/li>\n<li>Opposing client positions may be<br \/>\n        internally offset at aggregate level.<\/li>\n<li>Residual exposure is externally<br \/>\n        hedged or retained within defined risk limits.<\/li>\n<li>Base&#8217;s decision to offset, hedge,<br \/>\n        or retain the resulting exposure does not, in itself, change the pricing and<br \/>\n        execution terms applicable to the client&#8217;s account.<\/li>\n<li>Base manages exposure primarily at<br \/>\n        aggregate portfolio level and does not alter a client&#8217;s applicable pricing or<br \/>\n        execution solely because the client is profitable or because the resulting<br \/>\n        exposure is hedged or retained.<\/li>\n<li>The preferred commercial model is<br \/>\n        transparent trading revenue from clients who continue to trade.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">This is consistent with the broader Base<br \/>\n        proposition. The firm competes on clear total pricing, credible liquidity,<br \/>\n        execution oversight, straightforward funding and withdrawals, and access to<br \/>\n        people who understand the trading environment.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">It does not claim that trading is easy or<br \/>\n        that clients will necessarily be profitable. CFDs are high-risk products and<br \/>\n        most retail traders lose money. The point is narrower and more important: a<br \/>\n        broker does not need to design its business around making an individual client<br \/>\n        fail.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 17px 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 17px\">Four common myths<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0 5px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 15px\">Myth 1: A-book means there is no conflict<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">An external hedge can reduce market risk, but<br \/>\n        the broker still controls pricing, execution rules, margin, and the client<br \/>\n        relationship. A label does not guarantee good conduct.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0 5px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 15px\">Myth 2: B-book means<br \/>\n        the broker is manipulating trades<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Retaining exposure creates a potential<br \/>\n        conflict, not proof of abuse. Fair pricing, consistent execution, adequate<br \/>\n        capital, and reliable withdrawals remain the proper tests.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0 5px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 15px\">Myth 3: Raw spreads or<br \/>\n        MT5 Depth of Market prove A-book execution<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">They do not. They show elements of the client<br \/>\n        trading environment, not the broker&#8217;s complete aggregate exposure or external<br \/>\n        hedge activity.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0 5px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 15px\">Myth 4: A low hedge<br \/>\n        percentage means most client trades are being bet against<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Not necessarily. Gross client positions may<br \/>\n        offset substantially. A small hedge as a percentage of gross volume can cover<br \/>\n        all of the remaining net directional risk.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 17px 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 17px\">Frequently asked<br \/>\n        questions<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0 5px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 15px\">Is A-book always safer<br \/>\n        than B-book?<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">No. The label alone does not establish<br \/>\n        financial strength, execution quality, governance, or withdrawal reliability. A<br \/>\n        poorly capitalised A-book broker can still fail, while a well-capitalised<br \/>\n        hybrid broker can manage risk responsibly.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0 5px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 15px\">Does a broker profit<br \/>\n        when I lose?<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">It may benefit from losses on exposure it<br \/>\n        retains, but it may also lose when retained clients win. Many brokers earn<br \/>\n        primarily from spreads, commission, financing, and other fees while managing<br \/>\n        aggregate market exposure separately.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0 5px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 15px\">Does internalisation<br \/>\n        affect my price?<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">It should not result in unfair treatment.<br \/>\n        Base&#8217;s decision to offset, hedge, or retain the resulting exposure does not, in<br \/>\n        itself, change the pricing and execution terms applicable to the client&#8217;s<br \/>\n        account.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0 5px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 15px\">Can I see whether my<br \/>\n        exact trade was hedged?<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Usually not from a retail platform. Hedging<br \/>\n        may occur at aggregate portfolio level and may change as other clients trade.<br \/>\n        Ask the broker how its overall process works.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0 5px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 15px\">Why would a broker<br \/>\n        retain any exposure?<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Tiny residual positions may be uneconomic to<br \/>\n        hedge, offsetting flow may arrive quickly, and limited exposure may fall within<br \/>\n        an approved risk appetite. The issue is whether the risk is controlled and<br \/>\n        adequately funded.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0 5px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 15px\">What should make me<br \/>\n        cautious?<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Unclear total costs, unexplained execution<br \/>\n        differences, withdrawal pressure, evasive answers about the legal entity or<br \/>\n        regulator, and extravagant promises unsupported by the actual trading product<br \/>\n        should all prompt further investigation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 17px 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; break-after: avoid; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(85, 48, 184, 1); font-size: 17px\">Conclusion: judge the<br \/>\n        broker, not the label<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 7px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">A-book and B-book are convenient shorthand,<br \/>\n        but they often obscure more than they reveal. A CFD broker remains the client&#8217;s<br \/>\n        counterparty. Behind that contract, the broker can offset client flow, hedge<br \/>\n        externally, retain controlled exposure, or combine all three.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">The real dividing line is not between a<br \/>\n        pure A-book and a pure B-book. It is between brokers that manage exposure<br \/>\n        professionally and treat clients fairly, and brokers that use opaque pricing,<br \/>\n        weak capital, or withdrawal obstruction to protect themselves.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?q=https:\/\/secure.basemarkets.com\/marketing\/links\/go\/18&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1788524114653000&amp;sa=E\" rel=\"follow\">Base Markets<\/a> offers a direct version of<br \/>\n        the hybrid model: aggregate the book, offset opposing flow, manage the<br \/>\n        residual, keep risk-management decisions separate from the pricing and<br \/>\n        execution terms applicable to each client&#8217;s account, and earn transparent<br \/>\n        revenue from long-term trading activity.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">For traders, the practical test is equally<br \/>\n        direct. Understand what you pay. Assess the execution you receive. Ask how the<br \/>\n        broker manages risk. Check who regulates, owns, and finances it. Then judge<br \/>\n        whether it behaves like a business built to be there when markets, and clients,<br \/>\n        are profitable.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 8px; text-align: justify; line-height: 112%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgba(35, 39, 47, 1); font-size: 13px\">Risk warning: Trading CFDs carries a<br \/>\n            high level of risk to capital and may not be suitable for all investors. Trade<br \/>\n            only with money you can afford to lose, ensure you understand the risks, and<br \/>\n            seek independent advice where necessary.<\/p>\n<p>                            This article was written by IL Contributors at investinglive.com.<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Quick answer The usual explanation is simple. An A-book broker hedges a client trade with a liquidity provider, while a B-book broker keeps the exposure and may benefit if the client loses.&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":216,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[86],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-437710","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-market-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/437710","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/216"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=437710"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/437710\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=437710"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=437710"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=437710"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}