{"id":438201,"date":"2026-09-16T18:07:31","date_gmt":"2026-09-16T11:07:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/market-news\/the-s-a-hawkish-fed-could-exacerbate-the-losses-438201\/"},"modified":"2026-09-16T18:07:31","modified_gmt":"2026-09-16T11:07:31","slug":"the-s-a-hawkish-fed-could-exacerbate-the-losses","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/market-news\/the-s-a-hawkish-fed-could-exacerbate-the-losses-438201\/","title":{"rendered":"The S&amp;P 500 reached its pain threshold with oil above $100; a hawkish Fed could exacerbate the losses"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 11px; line-height: 105%; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif; font-size: 15px\">FUNDAMENTAL<br \/>\n        OVERVIEW<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 11px; line-height: 105%; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif; font-size: 15px\">\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 11px; line-height: 105%; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif; font-size: 15px\">The S&amp;P 500 has<br \/>\n        been inversely correlated with oil prices recently as the break above the psychological<br \/>\n        $100 dollars a barrel triggered a hawkish repricing across the board and<br \/>\n        increased inflation and growth concerns.\u00a0It looks like we<br \/>\n        reached the pain threshold for the market, and a more hawkish Fed could just<br \/>\n        exacerbate the losses.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 11px; line-height: 105%; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif; font-size: 15px\">Chart: S&amp;P 500 vs WTI crude oil (blue &#8211; inverted)<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 11px; line-height: 105%; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif; font-size: 15px\">\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 11px; line-height: 105%; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif; font-size: 15px\">The focus today<br \/>\n        will be on the <a href=\"https:\/\/investinglive.com\/central-banks\/fomc-preview-the-question-is-not-whether-the-fed-hikes-today-but-how-much-tightening-it-signals\/\" rel=\"follow\">FOMC decision<\/a>. The consensus is for the Fed to hike by 25 bps,<br \/>\n        with potentially one or two dissenters voting for a hold. At this meeting, we<br \/>\n        get the Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) and the Dot Plot. <\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 11px; line-height: 105%; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif; font-size: 15px\">Traders will be<br \/>\n        focused on the latter where the Fed is expected to project two more rate hikes,<br \/>\n        one in 2026 and one in 2027. This would still be below the current market<br \/>\n        pricing of three more rate hikes by the end of 2027. Fed Chair Warsh is not<br \/>\n        expected to offer much in terms of forward guidance but just repeat his <a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalreserve.gov\/newsevents\/speech\/warsh20260828a.htm\" style=\"color: rgba(70, 120, 134, 1); text-decoration: underline\" rel=\"follow\">Jackson Hole message<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 11px; line-height: 105%; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif; font-size: 15px\">If the Fed signals<br \/>\n        three or more further hikes, that would likely be taken as a hawkish surprise<br \/>\n        and could trigger a selloff in the S&amp;P 500. Conversely, a forecast<br \/>\n        suggesting just one or two more rate hikes could be taken as dovish and could lead<br \/>\n        to a relief rally in the short-term.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 11px; line-height: 105%; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif; font-size: 15px\">The other major<br \/>\n        focus will be developments in the Middle East, as oil prices have been the key<br \/>\n        driver of markets recently, so any de-escalation in the Middle East could push<br \/>\n        oil prices lower and lead to a dovish repricing, which could ultimately support<br \/>\n        the S&amp;P 500.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 11px; line-height: 105%; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif; font-size: 15px\">For now, I think<br \/>\n        the macro backdrop will continue to limit the upside and weigh on the market unless<br \/>\n        we get a de-escalation in the Middle East or a dovish Fed.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 11px; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif; line-height: normal; font-size: 15px\">\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 11px; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif; line-height: normal; font-size: 15px\">S&amp;P 500 TECHNICAL ANALYSIS \u2013 DAILY TIMEFRAME<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p style='margin-right: 0; margin-left: 0; font-family: \"Times New Roman\", serif; font-size: 16px'><a name=\"_Hlk211424107\">On<br \/>\n            the daily chart, <\/a><a name=\"_Hlk210300272\">we can see that<br \/>\n            <\/a>the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tradingview.com\/symbols\/US500\/\" rel=\"follow\">S&amp;P 500 (CFD tracking E-mini futures)<\/a> is trading at the 7,600 support<br \/>\n            ahead of the FOMC decision. The buyers will likely step in around these levels<br \/>\n            with a defined risk below the support to position for a rally into new record<br \/>\n            highs. The sellers, on the other hand, will want to see the price breaking<br \/>\n            lower to pile in for a drop into the 7,300 level next. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 11px; line-height: 105%; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif; font-size: 15px\">S&amp;P 500<br \/>\n        TECHNICAL ANALYSIS \u2013 4 HOUR TIMEFRAME<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p style='margin-right: 0; margin-left: 0; font-family: \"Times New Roman\", serif; font-size: 16px'><a name=\"_Hlk211424172\">On<br \/>\n            the 4 hour chart,<\/a><a name=\"_Hlk210300316\"> we have a<br \/>\n                downward trendline defining the bearish structure. If we get a pullback into<br \/>\n                the trendline, we can expect the sellers to lean on the trendline with a<br \/>\n                defined risk above it to target a break below the support and new lows. The<br \/>\n                buyers, on the other hand, will look for a break higher to increase the bullish<br \/>\n                bets into the next trendline around the 7,700 level.<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 11px; line-height: 105%; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif; font-size: 15px\">S&amp;P 500 TECHNICAL<br \/>\n        ANALYSIS \u2013 1 HOUR TIMEFRAME<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p style='margin-right: 0; margin-left: 0; font-family: \"Times New Roman\", serif; font-size: 16px'>On the 1 hour chart, we can<br \/>\n        see the price is breaking above the minor trendline that was defining the<br \/>\n        bearish momentum on this timeframe. It could be a signal of a bigger pullback into<br \/>\n        the next trendline but from a risk management perspective, it would be better<br \/>\n        to wait for the FOMC decision before committing to new positions. The red lines<br \/>\n        define the <a href=\"https:\/\/investinglive.com\/Education\/trading-tip-know-the-average-daily-range-adr-20220207\/\" style=\"color: rgba(70, 120, 134, 1); text-decoration: underline\" rel=\"follow\">average daily range<\/a> for today. <\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 11px; line-height: 105%; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif; font-size: 15px\">UPCOMING CATALYSTS<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0 0 11px; line-height: 105%; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif; font-size: 15px\"><a href=\"https:\/\/investinglive.com\/EconomicCalendar\" style=\"color: rgba(70, 120, 134, 1); text-decoration: underline\" rel=\"follow\">Today<\/a>, we have the<br \/>\n        FOMC rate decision. Tomorrow, we get the US Jobless Claims figures. Traders<br \/>\n        will also keep a close eye on developments in the Middle East.<\/p>\n<p>                            This article was written by Giuseppe Dellamotta at investinglive.com.<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>FUNDAMENTAL OVERVIEW \u00a0 The S&amp;P 500 has been inversely correlated with oil prices recently as the break above the psychological $100 dollars a barrel triggered a hawkish repricing across the board and&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":216,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[86],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-438201","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-market-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/438201","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/216"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=438201"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/438201\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=438201"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=438201"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=438201"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}