{"id":441864,"date":"2026-11-11T03:40:15","date_gmt":"2026-11-10T20:40:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/market-news\/anthropic-looks-to-be-pricing-its-ipo-for-success-441864\/"},"modified":"2026-11-11T03:40:15","modified_gmt":"2026-11-10T20:40:15","slug":"anthropic-looks-to-be-pricing-its-ipo-for-success","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/market-news\/anthropic-looks-to-be-pricing-its-ipo-for-success-441864\/","title":{"rendered":"Anthropic looks to be pricing its IPO for success"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p>There are two kinds of IPOs.<\/p>\n<p>Most recently, all the high-profile IPOs have been cash-outs. They have been vehicles for venture capitalists to hype up an offering at a ridiculous valuation and use retail for exit liquidity. CNBC plays into this by giving wall-to-wall coverage to IPOs, despite years of them costing retail traders money, particularly the ones they have focused intensely on.<\/p>\n<p>On the other side are IPOs for companies that are looking to build a long-term shareholder base. In those, the IPO isn&#8217;t priced overly aggressively and the fundraising isn&#8217;t too high.<\/p>\n<p>Anthropic is showing signs that it wants to be in the latter camp. Reports today say they have already found bids for $60 billion, which is the reported size of the IPO. It wasn&#8217;t disclosed what the price on that will be, but it&#8217;s likely to creep higher as we get close to the finish line. In any case, it doesn&#8217;t look like they&#8217;re trying to maximize the valuation at this point. There was talk of $2 trillion earlier this year and now it looks to be in the $1.25 to $1.75 trillion range.<\/p>\n<p>Now I&#8217;m not going to argue that isn&#8217;t a huge number and the whole thing requires some heroic assumptions but the adjustments on the valuation don&#8217;t scream that this is one to avoid.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">The FT reports that Goldman Sachs, the lead bank on the deal, is telling investors Anthropic will do about $52 billion in revenue this year, up from $4.6 billion in 2025. More than 10x is always good.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\"> From there the forecast is $136 billion in 2027, $442 billion in 2029 and more than $600 billion in 2030.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Put that in perspective. Only two companies in the S&amp;P 500 have revenue above $600 billion: Amazon and Walmart, both a little over $700 billion. Apple is at $416 billion. Goldman is saying a company founded less than six years ago will be the third-largest in America by sales in four years.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">On those numbers, the valuation math changes quickly. At $1.25 to $1.75 trillion, you\u2019re paying 24 to 34 times this year\u2019s revenue, which is nosebleed territory. On the 2027 number it\u2019s 9 to 13 times. On 2030 it\u2019s 2 to 3 times, which is cheaper than the S&amp;P 500 trades today. I&#8217;m very skeptical but skepticism hasn&#8217;t exactly paid in the AI boom.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">There is also a catch, and it\u2019s a big one. Goldman doesn\u2019t see Anthropic turning free cash flow positive until 2030, when it forecasts $33.6 billion. That\u2019s a margin under 6% on $600 billion in sales, and it puts the IPO at 37 to 52 times free cash flow that\u2019s four years away. Meanwhile, the company has committed to spend around $900 billion on computing capacity. The $60 billion raise is a rounding error against that bill.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Remember who is making these forecasts too. This is the bank selling the deal, talking to a potential buyer. Revenue has to grow 160% next year and then keep compounding at 80% a year through 2029 just to hit the script.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">That&#8217;s not the kind of thing that gets me excited and I will not be even thinking about buying the opening print but &#8212; for the broader market &#8212; there are indications it will go well.<\/p>\n<p>                            This article was written by Adam Button at investinglive.com.<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There are two kinds of IPOs. Most recently, all the high-profile IPOs have been cash-outs. They have been vehicles for venture capitalists to hype up an offering at a ridiculous valuation and&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":216,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[86],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-441864","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-market-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/441864","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/216"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=441864"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/441864\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=441864"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=441864"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=441864"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}