{"id":442228,"date":"2026-11-16T00:40:06","date_gmt":"2026-11-15T17:40:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/market-news\/nvida-stock-analysis-before-its-earnings-442228\/"},"modified":"2026-11-16T00:40:06","modified_gmt":"2026-11-15T17:40:06","slug":"nvida-stock-analysis-before-its-earnings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/market-news\/nvida-stock-analysis-before-its-earnings-442228\/","title":{"rendered":"Nvida stock analysis before its earnings"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p>Nvidia stock lost 12.75% while Nasdaq futures gained 3%. Now comes the $167-$174 test<\/p>\n<p>Nvidia&#8217;s sharp rebound from $148.80 was followed by another selloff. With earnings approaching and a new interim CEO in place, the next price tests could reveal whether buyers are regaining confidence or merely interrupting a larger decline.<\/p>\n<p>Nvidia shares (NVDA) fell 12.75% in the week ended November 13, while E-mini Nasdaq-100 futures (NQ) gained 3.02%. That is an important divergence for a stock widely regarded as a barometer of the artificial intelligence trade.<\/p>\n<p>The message is not that Nvidia must recover or that technology stocks are immune to further selling. It is that Nvidia&#8217;s weakness has been considerably greater than that of its benchmark, and traders should watch whether that gap starts closing or becomes even more pronounced.<\/p>\n<p>For Nvidia bulls, the first meaningful recovery test is approximately $167-$174. For bears, the ability of buyers to defend $158-$162 may be equally important.<\/p>\n<p>Nvidia&#8217;s rebound looked impressive. Friday exposed its weakness.<\/p>\n<p>The sequence of Nvidia&#8217;s recent trading is more informative than the weekly percentage decline alone.<\/p>\n<p>On Monday, November 9, the stock opened near $173 following the previous Friday&#8217;s $186.64 close. It subsequently recovered toward $179, but still finished the session lower.<\/p>\n<p>Tuesday brought renewed selling. Wednesday offered another recovery attempt, taking Nvidia to $177.54 before the stock settled at $173.73.<\/p>\n<p>Then came Thursday&#8217;s extraordinary session.<\/p>\n<p>Nvidia opened near $151 on November 12 and traded across a wide $148.80-$167.14 range. By the end of the first four-hour trading period, shares had recovered to approximately $166, eventually closing at $166.19.<\/p>\n<p>Daily trading volume reached approximately 747.7 million shares, more than four times the preceding 20-session average.<\/p>\n<p>That recovery matters. It shows that substantially lower prices did not simply lead to uninterrupted selling. Buyers were able to push the stock much higher during the session, although the available price observations cannot establish who initiated the move or the exact sequence of every intraday high and low.<\/p>\n<p>But Friday changed the interpretation.<\/p>\n<p>Nvidia opened near $170, briefly reached that price and subsequently traded down to $158.39 before closing at $162.85.<\/p>\n<p>Consider what that means for expectations.<\/p>\n<p>Someone encouraged by Thursday&#8217;s recovery might reasonably have wanted to see Nvidia establish itself above $170 and challenge Wednesday&#8217;s highs. Instead, the recovery failed to gain traction.<\/p>\n<p>That is a disappointment for the bullish interpretation, even though it does not establish that sellers have regained complete control.<\/p>\n<p>Importantly, Friday did not break Thursday&#8217;s $148.80 extreme.<\/p>\n<p>The market has demonstrated both the ability to rebound sharply and the inability, so far, to sustain that rebound.<\/p>\n<p>Why $167-$174 is Nvidia&#8217;s first meaningful recovery test<\/p>\n<p>A useful way to evaluate the next move is to examine where trading activity was concentrated during the completed November 9-13 week.<\/p>\n<p>An estimated point of control, or POC, identifies a price region associated with particularly heavy trading activity. It is a reference area, not a magic support or resistance line.<\/p>\n<p>For Nvidia, the estimates place that region at approximately $167-$172. Actual recent price behavior, including Friday&#8217;s failure around $170 and Wednesday&#8217;s $173.73 close, supports watching the slightly wider $167-$174 corridor.<\/p>\n<p>Here is what would make the next recovery more convincing:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>First, reclaim $167-$174. A brief move through this region is less persuasive than a recovery that remains above it.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Next, defend the area on a subsequent test. Former resistance beginning to behave as support would be encouraging.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Then challenge $177-$181. That corridor includes last week&#8217;s estimated upper value-area boundary and the observed $179.92 weekly high.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The second hurdle matters because a stock can recover toward the center of its recent trading activity without escaping the broader pattern of weakness.<\/p>\n<p>A sustained recovery above $177-$181 would present a stronger challenge to the immediate bearish thesis than merely revisiting $170.<\/p>\n<p>Beyond that, approximately $188-$190 represents another older trading area that buyers would eventually need to overcome. These are successive tests, not promised price targets.<\/p>\n<p>What if Nvidia breaks below $160 instead?<\/p>\n<p>The downside deserves the same conditional treatment.<\/p>\n<p>$158-$162 is the first defensive area to monitor.<\/p>\n<p>It includes Friday&#8217;s actual $158.39 low and the estimated lower boundary of the November 9-13 value area, near $160.47.<\/p>\n<p>An important distinction is that Nvidia closed Friday below the estimated center of last week&#8217;s trading activity, but remained within its estimated value area.<\/p>\n<p>That is weak positioning, but not the same thing as having established sustained trading below the area&#8217;s lower boundary.<\/p>\n<p>If Nvidia returns to $158-$162 and buyers successfully defend it, the possibility of stabilization remains open.<\/p>\n<p>If the stock instead trades persistently below that region, the November 12 low of $148.80 becomes the next important observed reference.<\/p>\n<p>Below $148.80, traders would be evaluating whether a new downside expansion is underway.<\/p>\n<p>Even there, the behavior matters. A temporary break below $148.80 followed by a strong recovery would have different implications from repeated failures to regain that price.<\/p>\n<p>The level identifies a test, not a guaranteed continuation.<\/p>\n<p>Nasdaq futures are telling a different story<\/p>\n<p>Nvidia is an important technology bellwether, but it is not the entire technology market.<\/p>\n<p>That is why comparing its behavior with E-mini Nasdaq-100 futures is useful.<\/p>\n<p>During the week ended November 13:<\/p>\n<p>The comparison uses Nvidia&#8217;s stock-market sessions and the longer trading sessions of continuous NQ futures, so it is a relative-strength comparison rather than two identical trading schedules.<\/p>\n<p>Despite Nvidia&#8217;s substantial losses, NQ futures finished the week higher.<\/p>\n<p>That does not mean Nasdaq traders ignored the Nvidia developments. Friday&#8217;s futures session itself showed renewed weakness, with prices reaching 27,695.25 before closing at 27,927.25.<\/p>\n<p>It means the broader benchmark has, over the same week, been more resilient than Nvidia.<\/p>\n<p>For the coming sessions, I would pay particular attention to three NQ areas.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>27,585-27,725: Near-term downside defense<\/p>\n<p>This region includes last week&#8217;s estimated lower trading-value boundary and Friday&#8217;s actual 27,695.25 low.<\/p>\n<p>A sustained loss would increase concern about broader technology weakness. A successful defense would complicate a bearish continuation argument.<\/p>\n<p>28,000-28,115: First recovery test<\/p>\n<p>The recently completed week&#8217;s estimated POC falls around 28,000-28,060, with another developing November reference near 28,115.<\/p>\n<p>A sustained recovery would improve the near-term index picture.<\/p>\n<p>28,230-28,400: More meaningful structural improvement<\/p>\n<p>The October low at 28,232.75 provides an observed reference near the beginning of this zone.<\/p>\n<p>Recovering and holding above it would be more meaningful than simply crossing 28,000.<\/p>\n<p>The four Nvidia-Nasdaq combinations worth watching<\/p>\n<p>The most useful information may come from observing the two instruments together.<\/p>\n<p>1. Both recover their nearby resistance areas.<\/p>\n<p>Nvidia establishes itself above $167-$174 while NQ regains 28,000-28,115.<\/p>\n<p>That would make the recovery argument more convincing because the improvement would no longer be confined to one stock.<\/p>\n<p>2. Nasdaq recovers, but Nvidia cannot.<\/p>\n<p>NQ holds above its nearby resistance while Nvidia continues failing under $174.<\/p>\n<p>This would suggest that Nvidia&#8217;s weakness remains disproportionately company-specific. The broader index would be demonstrating resilience, while Nvidia itself would still have work to do.<\/p>\n<p>3. Nvidia recovers, but Nasdaq struggles.<\/p>\n<p>A Nvidia recovery above $174 without corresponding NQ strength could indicate a stock-specific rebound rather than a broader technology recovery.<\/p>\n<p>Traders should watch whether that divergence persists.<\/p>\n<p>4. Both lose their nearby support areas.<\/p>\n<p>Nvidia establishes sustained trade below approximately $158-$160 while NQ loses 27,585-27,725.<\/p>\n<p>This would offer stronger cross-market evidence of deterioration, making Nvidia&#8217;s $148.80 low and NQ&#8217;s 27,516 low relevant next tests.<\/p>\n<p>None of these combinations guarantees a subsequent move. They help identify what evidence supports or challenges a developing interpretation.<\/p>\n<p>Nvidia&#8217;s longer-term problem is bigger than a $170 recovery<\/p>\n<p>There is another comparison worth considering, particularly for investors rather than short-term traders.<\/p>\n<p>Nvidia finished Friday approximately 22.5% below October&#8217;s estimated lower trading-value boundary near $210.21.<\/p>\n<p>Nasdaq futures, by comparison, finished approximately 1.1% below their October equivalent near 28,232.75.<\/p>\n<p>These historical volume-based estimates are approximate, but the magnitude of the difference is instructive.<\/p>\n<p>Nvidia needs considerably more structural recovery to regain its October trading region.<\/p>\n<p>Someone considering Nvidia as a longer-term investment therefore faces a different question from someone trading a short-term rebound.<\/p>\n<p>Regaining $174 might improve the short-term chart. It would not, by itself, restore the previous technical structure, establish that the stock is fundamentally cheap or eliminate uncertainty about Nvidia&#8217;s future earnings.<\/p>\n<p>Nvidia earnings and the leadership transition raise the stakes<\/p>\n<p>The market also faces two significant company developments.<\/p>\n<p>On November 12, <a href=\"https:\/\/nvidianews.nvidia.com\/news\/nvidia-announces-ceo-transition\" rel=\"follow\">Nvidia confirmed that Jensen Huang had resigned<\/a> as CEO and that CFO Colette Kress would serve as interim chief executive.<\/p>\n<p>The company is scheduled to report its third-quarter fiscal 2027 results on Tuesday, November 17, at approximately 4:20 p.m. Eastern, followed by its earnings conference call at 5 p.m. Eastern.<\/p>\n<p>The leadership transition introduces uncertainty about the company&#8217;s future direction. Earnings will offer investors a separate opportunity to evaluate its actual business performance, AI infrastructure demand, profitability and management outlook.<\/p>\n<p>It is important not to attribute every Nvidia price movement to the leadership announcement. Its relative weakness was already evident before the November 12 announcement.<\/p>\n<p>Both events also create significant execution risk.<\/p>\n<p>A stock can gap through multiple technical levels following an important announcement. Even a carefully chosen stop order cannot guarantee execution at its intended price.<\/p>\n<p>What I would watch next week<\/p>\n<p>For Nvidia, my first question is whether bulls can reclaim and defend $167-$174, followed by the more demanding $177-$181 region.<\/p>\n<p>If they cannot, attention returns to $158-$162, and potentially $148.80 if weakness persists.<\/p>\n<p>For Nasdaq futures, the immediate comparison is between recovery above 28,000-28,115 and deterioration below 27,585-27,725.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>But perhaps the most important lesson is this:<\/p>\n<p>A powerful rebound does not necessarily mean buyers have won, just as a severe decline does not mean sellers will automatically succeed again.<\/p>\n<p>Thursday&#8217;s Nvidia recovery was impressive. Friday&#8217;s failure to maintain it was disappointing. The next useful evidence will come from how the market behaves around these meaningful price areas.<\/p>\n<p>And with earnings on Tuesday, patience may be especially valuable. Sometimes the best decision is to observe what the market actually demonstrates rather than assume that a stock has already fallen far enough or must continue falling.<\/p>\n<p>Analysis based on completed market observations through Friday, November 13, 2026. Price and volume-profile areas are indicative, not guaranteed trading signals. Educational only. Trade at your own risk.<\/p>\n<p>                            This article was written by Itai Levitan at investinglive.com.<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Nvidia stock lost 12.75% while Nasdaq futures gained 3%. Now comes the $167-$174 test Nvidia&#8217;s sharp rebound from $148.80 was followed by another selloff. With earnings approaching and a new interim CEO&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":216,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[86],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-442228","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-market-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/442228","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/216"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=442228"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/442228\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=442228"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=442228"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swingfish.trade\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=442228"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}