The Super Micro comparison gives dip buyers a narrative, but the stronger signal will come from the November 17 results and any board statement. Markets tend to recover from governance shocks faster when the business underneath is visibly healthy, so strong guidance would do more to stabilize the shares than any precedent. The risk to this view is a messy or drawn-out leadership change, which would keep a discount on the stock and weigh on the AI-linked names that sold off alongside it. That includes Asian hardware suppliers with heavy Nvidia exposure.
—
Earlier:
- Nvidia stock plunges after hours as New York Times reports new Jensen Huang relationship allegation
- Nvidia CEO Huang faces 2nd relationship report as NYT links him to senior executive
Also:
—
Super Micro shows that scandal selling can overshoot, but Nvidia’s problem sits at the very top of the company, and that makes the parallel imperfect.
Summary:
- The Wall Street Journal points to Super Micro Computer’s recovery as a possible sign Nvidia shares could rebound from the Huang turmoil
- Super Micro co-founder Wally Liaw resigned from the board in March after being indicted over an alleged scheme to smuggle Nvidia-equipped servers to China
- Super Micro shares plunged after his exit but have rebounded 48% from their March 20 low
- Unlike Nvidia, Super Micro kept its CEO, so it faced no succession question
- Nvidia’s next test is its results on November 17
Nvidia shareholders looking for a precedent may find one close to home. Super Micro Computer, which builds servers around Nvidia’s chips, went through its own China-linked scandal this year and has since staged a strong recovery. The Wall Street Journal suggests that pattern could point to an eventual rebound in Nvidia shares, despite the turmoil around chief executive Jensen Huang.
In March, federal prosecutors unsealed an indictment charging Super Micro co-founder Yih-Shyan “Wally” Liaw and two others with conspiring to divert about $2.5 billion of servers containing restricted Nvidia chips to China. Liaw resigned from the board, and Super Micro said it was cooperating with law enforcement. The shares plunged after his departure, but they have since climbed 48% from their March 20 low, the Journal noted.
The comparison has some logic. In both cases, the market’s first reaction was to price in the worst outcome. In Super Micro’s case, investors then reassessed once it became clear the underlying business was intact. Demand for AI hardware did not disappear because of a scandal at the top of a supplier. The same could prove true for Nvidia, whose chips remain the industry standard.
There are also important differences. Liaw was a director and senior executive, but Super Micro’s chief executive, Charles Liang, stayed in place, so the company kept its leadership. Nvidia’s problem centers on Huang himself, the co-founder whose vision and relationships with customers and governments are closely tied to the company’s identity. A forced exit would raise succession questions that Super Micro never faced. Nvidia is also far larger, so its recovery would depend on the broader AI trade as much as on relief specific to the stock.
Corporate history offers some reassurance. Several large companies, including Intel in 2018 and McDonald’s in 2019, lost chief executives over relationships with employees and carried on without lasting damage to the business. But neither was a founder-led firm at the center of a global technology race.
For now, the useful takeaway is that selling driven by scandal can overshoot when the business itself is sound. Whether that holds for Nvidia depends on what the board decides, how cleanly any succession is handled, and what the company says when it reports results on November 17.
This article was written by Eamonn Sheridan at investinglive.com.